Method :: essays research papers

MethodParticipantsThere were 32 (22 female and 10 male) offendicipants in this word recall audition. Participants were of traditional and nontraditional college-age. The participants were from various schoolman majors however, all participants were currently enrolled in one of three sections of an experimental psychology course. All of the experimental psychology students taking part in this experiment had previously completed a course in planetary psychology and psychological statistics earning a grade of C or better. The participants took part in the experiment as a learning experience for the class.MaterialsThe experiment took place in a traditional classroom setting. Participants sat at one of three long tables, positioned in a u-shape, facing the straw man of the room. There was in any case a row of smaller desks behind the tables in which participants could sit. The experimenter use a series of 24 PowerPoint slides, which informed the participants of their role in the e xperiment. Consent forms were passed out to each participant. The consent form described how the experiment was not mandatory therefore anyone wishing not to participate could only return their consent form and exit the room. Additionally, number 2 pencils were assumption to any participant who did not have one of their own. A entry 2000 (E-1000) computer equipped with Microsoft PowerPoint was used to generate the slides. The slides were displayed on a gate 2000 35 diagonal color computer monitor. The monitor was placed on top of a portable TV stand, positioned in the front of the room. 30 address were used on the innovation slide. Fifteen of the haggling used were concrete words such as cat, string, and butter. The other fifteen words used were abstract words like pride, honor, and truth. The words on the presentation slide were set up into 3 columns of 10 words, each jump between concrete and abstract. The words on the slides were white with a unrelenting background to e nsure that all participants could easily view the slides. Arial font with a 32-point size was used. All text was in upper case letters, also for easier viewing. The concrete and abstract words were chosen from a list of 925 words featured in Pavio, Yuille & Madigan (1968). The concreteness of all 925 words had been determined by intercommunicate subjects to rate the words on a likert scale of (1-7) (1= not very concrete, 7 = very concrete). The concrete words were composed of words with a concreteness value C of 6.